UK National Smoking Cessation Conference - UKNSCC
UKNSCC home page UKNSCC archive

< BACK

Smoking cessation - from pregnancy to old age
Older smokers - what we know and what we need to do
Susan Kerr

Powerpoint Presentation

Abstract
The hazards of smoking in later life are well established. Smoking not only increases the risk of premature death,
but it also affects the health and quality of life of older people, as they have a greater risk than their non-smoking counterparts of being disabled by conditions that include cancer, heart disease, COPD, circulatory problems, stroke and cognitive decline.

There is growing evidence to suggest that health is improved and mortality reduced among those who stop smoking after the age of 65 years. Stopping smoking not only adds 'years to life' but 'life to years' by preventing or reducing disability caused by smoking-related chronic illness/disease.

Unfortunately, despite the fact that older smokers have been identified as a priority group, and despite evidence that intervening with older adults can be effective, a number of studies have demonstrated that health professionals often fail to target this population. The reasons for this failure are unclear and require investigation. In addition, there is currently little research-based evidence on older smokers' views of smoking and smoking cessation in later life.

TOP

The Study
This paper will present findings from a recently completed study. The aim of the study was to gather data that would inform the development of smoking cessation training to help members of the primary care team provide older adults (65+ years) with information and advice that would encourage them to stop smoking.

The research approach was qualitative, gathering data from older smokers, former smokers and members of the primary care team. The study participants (n=61) were recruited through General Practices in the Greater Glasgow NHS Board Primary Care Division and the West of Scotland Seniors Forum.
The data were collected during individual, paired and focus group interviews and were analysed using constant
comparative procedures.

Susan Kerr
School of nursing, Midwifery and Community Health,
Glasgow Caledonian University
s.m.kerr@gcal.ac.uk

TOP